Oh man. What serious bass angler didnt have a Series One back in the 80's? Thanks for bringing me back to memory lane.mhood wrote:This one for sure:
old_rod_ID.jpg
A rod ahead of its time
Re: A rod ahead of its time
- rockchalk06
- Elite Angler
- Posts: 530
- Joined: Fri May 24, 2013 5:49 pm
- Location: OK
Re: A rod ahead of its time
Hogsticker2 wrote:I agree. Hard to explain, but these blanks just feel special.toddmc wrote:The Point Blank rod blanks fish differently than the other blanks that I have fished. They are very sensitive, light, and strong. The price is very reasonable for how good they are. They remind me of the handful of NRX blanks that I have fished. They have a very thick and stiff butt section, combined with a smooth loading tip.
Unfortunately, there aren't enough models. I wish that they made a 7' heavy. I don't want to have to cut down a longer blank.
I have 3 made from them. Two have cork grips and the other is a custom CF grip. That rod has lost me more jigs setting the hook on rocks and trees than any other
- Gone Phishin
- Pro Angler
- Posts: 1949
- Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2006 8:08 pm
- Location: Wisconsin
Re: A rod ahead of its time
Fishing4Fun wrote:This may sound "odd" but I don't like it for bottom contact all that much. The only exception is I will use it for really light wire finesse plastics/jigs on occasion.Gone Phishin wrote:Fishing4Fun wrote:Wish I would have bought that one as well. Have the 6'10 casting and it weighs 3 ounces.Gone Phishin wrote:Fishing4Fun wrote:Shimano Cumulus. Still haven't seen a rod that can touch them for weight.
That 7'1"...
Put me in your will for that rod!
I've probably caught more fish on that stick than any other over the past several years...I generally have a 1/4oz Baby Rage Craw tied on.
What have you found the 6'10" to excel at?
What I do like it "best" for is jerkbaits and topwater poppers. With it being a very light rod and given the fatigue of using techniques that require the user to work the rod to impart action in the bait, this rod has helped with fatigue when fishing these kids of baits for a long time. It also has the perfect action for these techniques.
Also the oddest thing is this rod is labeled as a Medium Heavy. IMO it is the most improperly rated rod I have ever fished. The rod loads pretty deep into the blank while casting and once a fish is hooked up. Also I don't feel comfortable casting anything much heavier than just under a 1/2 oz. The rod fishes more like a true Medium. For reference I have a Majorcraft Speedstyle ML casting rod that isn't too far off from how this rod behaves though the Cumulus has a touch more power.
So I have found this particular rod to pair perfect with a Alphas SV 105 and 8# line. Perfect for hard and softbait finesse apps. After several years of trying it for weightless plastics and texas rigs and getting a very poor hook up ratio I have moved it onto lighter apps and it seems to feel perfect for those. I am sure others will have different uses and perhaps findings so your mileage may vary...
I could totally see that. I have always wanted to give the 6'5" casting model a shot at small diving jerkbaits like the Pointer 78DD...would love to have the Cumulus sensitivity deadsticking those baits in cold water.
The labeling on the 7'1" is odd as well. I'll fish it up until the grass starts getting thick in the Summer, then I put it down until Autumn arrives.
Amen brother.ScoobyDoo wrote:If there was ever a rod that i never once felt the need to upgrade/ replace or got bored of.....that was it.Gone Phishin wrote:Fishing4Fun wrote:Shimano Cumulus. Still haven't seen a rod that can touch them for weight.
That 7'1"...
Re: A rod ahead of its time
Hopefully you are not fishing tungsten. It does get hard to feel the difference between hard objects with a sensitive rod. We've got a bunch of brush on my home lake and it's hard to tell the difference between a tungsten drop shot weight bouncing off of consecutive branches and the tap tap of a fish on the Point Blank rods.rockchalk06 wrote:Hogsticker2 wrote:I agree. Hard to explain, but these blanks just feel special.toddmc wrote:The Point Blank rod blanks fish differently than the other blanks that I have fished. They are very sensitive, light, and strong. The price is very reasonable for how good they are. They remind me of the handful of NRX blanks that I have fished. They have a very thick and stiff butt section, combined with a smooth loading tip.
Unfortunately, there aren't enough models. I wish that they made a 7' heavy. I don't want to have to cut down a longer blank.
I have 3 made from them. Two have cork grips and the other is a custom CF grip. That rod has lost me more jigs setting the hook on rocks and trees than any other
- Redlinerobert
- Platinum Angler
- Posts: 819
- Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2007 12:19 am
- Location: San Juan Bautista, CA
- Contact:
Re: A rod ahead of its time
I absolutely remember the Techna AV, as well as the All Star T40x. The old boron rods were also unobtainable for me.
2016 Ranger Z522 Mercury Racing 300
Re: A rod ahead of its time
I remember when All star T40x were the priciest rods in Bass pro's catalogRedlinerobert wrote:I absolutely remember the Techna AV, as well as the All Star T40x. The old boron rods were also unobtainable for me.
That was in the late 90s right?
I remember debating all star t40x and IMX...but then glx came out and had to have it....(could be off on the time frame though)
Ended up buying a 2 piece glx spinning rod for a florida trip....broke my personal best largemouth that still stands at 26". Closes since was a 25x19.5 jersey donkey.
- Redlinerobert
- Platinum Angler
- Posts: 819
- Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2007 12:19 am
- Location: San Juan Bautista, CA
- Contact:
Re: A rod ahead of its time
I wish I still had that T40x. I sold it a few years back. Cool rod.
2016 Ranger Z522 Mercury Racing 300