BFS vs Normal Setup
-
- Newbie Angler
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Sat Apr 23, 2022 1:43 pm
BFS vs Normal Setup
Simple question, will a bfs setup cast farther or a regular bass setup??
Equipment: Zodias M power with Aldebaran on 8lbs with 1/8oz worm
Or Curado/ SLX bfs with BFS rod and 8lbs with 1/8oz worm??
I have a Zodias M power with Aldebaran, and can cast pretty far with a 1/8oz worm. The question on my mind is, Will a bfs setup cast farther using the same weight??? Or should I stick to my Aldebaran setup??
Equipment: Zodias M power with Aldebaran on 8lbs with 1/8oz worm
Or Curado/ SLX bfs with BFS rod and 8lbs with 1/8oz worm??
I have a Zodias M power with Aldebaran, and can cast pretty far with a 1/8oz worm. The question on my mind is, Will a bfs setup cast farther using the same weight??? Or should I stick to my Aldebaran setup??
Re: BFS vs Normal Setup
BFS will cast further and most importantly with less effort than the normal bass gear, with the same weight.
I had an Aldebaran 50 and was casting 4g weights with it, and although it did cast them the tell always felt choked up at that weight, even my Chronarch handled 4g lures better. I ended up getting the 16 BFS and selling the Aldebaran 50 as other than its light weight I never really found it to be that good of a performer.
I had an Aldebaran 50 and was casting 4g weights with it, and although it did cast them the tell always felt choked up at that weight, even my Chronarch handled 4g lures better. I ended up getting the 16 BFS and selling the Aldebaran 50 as other than its light weight I never really found it to be that good of a performer.
- Hobie-Wan Kenobi
- Pro Angler
- Posts: 3014
- Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2014 1:25 pm
- Location: Michigan (U.P)
- Contact:
Re: BFS vs Normal Setup
Further... harder to tell (read below). Easier for the same distance, yes.
Something to note, if it is an 1/8oz weight plus worm, that changes weight quite a bit. Worm size also adds a big variable.
Pitching and short range casting will definitely feel better with a BFE reel. I love the Curado BFS for finesse bass plastics. Casts them good and better in the wind than the Aldebaran 50.
You can get about 45-50yds of 8lb FC on the Curado BFS. Plenty for finesse work. You can run a 10lb braid if more capacity is needed.
I also know the Curado BFS can skip weightless plastics (especially weightless flipping baits) very good too.
Something to note, if it is an 1/8oz weight plus worm, that changes weight quite a bit. Worm size also adds a big variable.
Pitching and short range casting will definitely feel better with a BFE reel. I love the Curado BFS for finesse bass plastics. Casts them good and better in the wind than the Aldebaran 50.
You can get about 45-50yds of 8lb FC on the Curado BFS. Plenty for finesse work. You can run a 10lb braid if more capacity is needed.
I also know the Curado BFS can skip weightless plastics (especially weightless flipping baits) very good too.
IG @hobie_wan_kenobi_fishing
Re: BFS vs Normal Setup
If you’re currently using a M rod to cast 1/8oz I’d also consider how well that rod loads with light weights compared to a BFS rod. A lighter rod with a lighter tip will sling your bait better - but as you’re creating this kind of whipping action, you need a BC and spool that handles your sudden/faster start ups better. In some ways they’re linked: a BFS rod that loads well calls for a BFS reel that can handle that load. Not saying the Aldebaran 50 won’t deal with it, but that’s where light BFS spools shine.
-
- Newbie Angler
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Sat Apr 23, 2022 1:43 pm
Re: BFS vs Normal Setup
Thanks for the replies, sounds like I'll benefit from the change!!! any specific rods that you guys recommend??? I don't mind 2 piece rods, that will probably make it easier for transporting and throwing it in the truck.
I will probably end up getting a SLX bfs reel from digitaka.
I will probably end up getting a SLX bfs reel from digitaka.
-
- Newbie Angler
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Sat Apr 23, 2022 1:43 pm
Re: BFS vs Normal Setup
Specifically what rods and power if you guys can. Ideally in the $100 range ......I know about the Dobyns, anything else that's out there??? I'll be using it mainly for Bass and very rarely the occasional trout in the mountains......
-
- Platinum Angler
- Posts: 854
- Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2011 9:29 am
Re: BFS vs Normal Setup
unless you really want a baitcaster, you will find (in that price range) a medium light spinning rod and reel will work better...
1-2%
- Hobie-Wan Kenobi
- Pro Angler
- Posts: 3014
- Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2014 1:25 pm
- Location: Michigan (U.P)
- Contact:
Re: BFS vs Normal Setup
Shimano has a couple affordable options for bass BFS rods.Bass4money wrote: ↑Sun Apr 24, 2022 1:26 pmSpecifically what rods and power if you guys can. Ideally in the $100 range ......I know about the Dobyns, anything else that's out there??? I'll be using it mainly for Bass and very rarely the occasional trout in the mountains......
IG @hobie_wan_kenobi_fishing
Re: BFS vs Normal Setup
You do realize this is TackleTour, right?SteveSchmelzle wrote: ↑Mon Apr 25, 2022 7:52 pmunless you really want a baitcaster, you will find (in that price range) a medium light spinning rod and reel will work better...
Cal, Managing Editor
"fish with mindfulness : beware the darkside"
"fish with mindfulness : beware the darkside"
Re: BFS vs Normal Setup
If you can stand to wait, there are some nice Aliexpress options too, anywhere from UL to ML, problem is some UL are more like Lights and some ML are stronger than USDM Medium powers. I have a similar issue, looking for a reel to match with a 6'10"ML casting rod, scared a true BFS will not have enough capacity of 8lb-10lb max fluorocarbon whilst throwing 1/8-3/16 with small plastics, like dropshots. Was considering waiting for the new Alphas SVTW Shallow, it seems to fit in between BFS/Finesse well for capacity, much like the CT SV reels did. The Aldebaran 30 MGL seemed to be the capacity I look for.
-
- Newbie Angler
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Sat Apr 23, 2022 1:43 pm
Re: BFS vs Normal Setup
Yes i know spinning can do just as good or better, but there's nothing like a tiny baitcaster!!!DirtyD64 wrote: ↑Wed Apr 27, 2022 4:24 amIf you can stand to wait, there are some nice Aliexpress options too, anywhere from UL to ML, problem is some UL are more like Lights and some ML are stronger than USDM Medium powers. I have a similar issue, looking for a reel to match with a 6'10"ML casting rod, scared a true BFS will not have enough capacity of 8lb-10lb max fluorocarbon whilst throwing 1/8-3/16 with small plastics, like dropshots. Was considering waiting for the new Alphas SVTW Shallow, it seems to fit in between BFS/Finesse well for capacity, much like the CT SV reels did. The Aldebaran 30 MGL seemed to be the capacity I look for.
Yeah the Aldebaran 30 has been amazing, really one of my favorite reels...... Can handle light setup and 3/8oz lures easily with enough line to break off twice and still be able to fish haha....
But I got the itch that can't be scratch, I need more gear....
Re: BFS vs Normal Setup
You'll fit in great here then. I have always found reels to cast further with lighter lures than most people claim (regular reels). I have not personally owed a true BFS reel, but even reels like my Chronarch MGL, Conquest HG, and even the big old Zillion TWS cast 3/16 heads with small plastics fine. This was using 10-12lb fluoro and at least a half spool of braid backing to further lighten, but the distance I got was great.Bass4money wrote: ↑Wed Apr 27, 2022 5:18 pmYes i know spinning can do just as good or better, but there's nothing like a tiny baitcaster!!!DirtyD64 wrote: ↑Wed Apr 27, 2022 4:24 amIf you can stand to wait, there are some nice Aliexpress options too, anywhere from UL to ML, problem is some UL are more like Lights and some ML are stronger than USDM Medium powers. I have a similar issue, looking for a reel to match with a 6'10"ML casting rod, scared a true BFS will not have enough capacity of 8lb-10lb max fluorocarbon whilst throwing 1/8-3/16 with small plastics, like dropshots. Was considering waiting for the new Alphas SVTW Shallow, it seems to fit in between BFS/Finesse well for capacity, much like the CT SV reels did. The Aldebaran 30 MGL seemed to be the capacity I look for.
Yeah the Aldebaran 30 has been amazing, really one of my favorite reels...... Can handle light setup and 3/8oz lures easily with enough line to break off twice and still be able to fish haha....
But I got the itch that can't be scratch, I need more gear....
- slipperybob
- Platinum Angler
- Posts: 1313
- Joined: Wed Nov 21, 2007 5:42 am
- Location: Lil'Can
Re: BFS vs Normal Setup
Back in the days, while running 15# braid setups and tossing lures mostly in the 1/4 oz on the Metanium MG7's were quite the boot. The one time I used my Curado 50E and had no brakes on, wow did it toss them 1/8 oz. lures far, until a little wind gave me the biggest spool blow up ever. LOL. I personally don't really cast that far. On average I only need about 25 yards cast. When I'm getting like 35 yards, that's a long cast for me.
This brings me to the Zodias Rods and I have both the ML the older one 7' glass and the newer 7'2" xf action. I have the Chronarch MGL with 20# Diawa J-Braid and it casts amazing smooth in part due to the monocoque handle. As far as distance goes, I have a Bantam MGL with 15# Diawa J-Braid, and it does more distance on 1/4 oz lures over the Chronarch MGL. That's all line diameter difference.
Now getting to the Curado BFS reels vs the Curado 70HG reels. Overall I haven't really fished the Curado BFS or rather haven't caught a fish on that reel on open water as of yet. Hopefully I will get to find out soon. However with just backyard dry casting, I'm finding the Curado BFS to be quiet smooth on the casts and a few feet further on the 1/8th oz. bullet weight. The older Curado 70 still feels smoother on the retrieve. Hopefully the weather stabilizes so I can get out on my day off work. Need to play with the equipment to test it out.
This brings me to the Zodias Rods and I have both the ML the older one 7' glass and the newer 7'2" xf action. I have the Chronarch MGL with 20# Diawa J-Braid and it casts amazing smooth in part due to the monocoque handle. As far as distance goes, I have a Bantam MGL with 15# Diawa J-Braid, and it does more distance on 1/4 oz lures over the Chronarch MGL. That's all line diameter difference.
Now getting to the Curado BFS reels vs the Curado 70HG reels. Overall I haven't really fished the Curado BFS or rather haven't caught a fish on that reel on open water as of yet. Hopefully I will get to find out soon. However with just backyard dry casting, I'm finding the Curado BFS to be quiet smooth on the casts and a few feet further on the 1/8th oz. bullet weight. The older Curado 70 still feels smoother on the retrieve. Hopefully the weather stabilizes so I can get out on my day off work. Need to play with the equipment to test it out.
slip bobbing is the laziest way to fish
-
- Newbie Angler
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Sat Apr 23, 2022 1:43 pm
Re: BFS vs Normal Setup
Good to know!!! I can't wait to see what the results are!!!slipperybob wrote: ↑Wed Apr 27, 2022 9:23 pmBack in the days, while running 15# braid setups and tossing lures mostly in the 1/4 oz on the Metanium MG7's were quite the boot. The one time I used my Curado 50E and had no brakes on, wow did it toss them 1/8 oz. lures far, until a little wind gave me the biggest spool blow up ever. LOL. I personally don't really cast that far. On average I only need about 25 yards cast. When I'm getting like 35 yards, that's a long cast for me.
This brings me to the Zodias Rods and I have both the ML the older one 7' glass and the newer 7'2" xf action. I have the Chronarch MGL with 20# Diawa J-Braid and it casts amazing smooth in part due to the monocoque handle. As far as distance goes, I have a Bantam MGL with 15# Diawa J-Braid, and it does more distance on 1/4 oz lures over the Chronarch MGL. That's all line diameter difference.
Now getting to the Curado BFS reels vs the Curado 70HG reels. Overall I haven't really fished the Curado BFS or rather haven't caught a fish on that reel on open water as of yet. Hopefully I will get to find out soon. However with just backyard dry casting, I'm finding the Curado BFS to be quiet smooth on the casts and a few feet further on the 1/8th oz. bullet weight. The older Curado 70 still feels smoother on the retrieve. Hopefully the weather stabilizes so I can get out on my day off work. Need to play with the equipment to test it out.
Re: BFS vs Normal Setup
I have a similar dilemma. I throw 5-9g total weight on a light bfs rod, rated 3.5-10g, 6-12lb line. I like 8lb fluoro at the least as I use it for river smallmouth. I have used an Ald 50hg and Steez sv tw + ZPI M both with 12lb fluoro for the higher end weights, and a 30mgl hg for around 5g with 20lb braid to 8lb leader. I learned I can't stand braid to fluoro for bottom contact, I like straight fluoro. Was thinking I'd get another 30mgl for straight 8lb fluoro but am definitely interested in the new Ald BFS if the right hand reels ever get stocked. Still haven't decided what reel to go with, I just know I'm going to run straight 8lb sniper.