Ultimate Cost No Object BFS reel for 1/32 or lighter lures?

How small is your rod and how light is your line? It's not about the size of your tackle, but how you work it. Come share your Ultralight and Bait Finesse System (BFS) fishing success here!
Post Reply
ultralight
Platinum Angler
Platinum Angler
Posts: 1336
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2004 2:32 pm

Ultimate Cost No Object BFS reel for 1/32 or lighter lures?

Post by ultralight » Thu Jan 31, 2019 1:11 pm

Continue to be curious about BFS though it's quite spendy to do right apparently.

Assuming cost no object and that one wants to cast 1/32nd oz (1 gram) or below, what would would be the ultimate BFS reel if:

a. Bone Stock

b. Willing to upgrade the spool?

Thanks in advance to you pros for comments...:)

poisonokie
Pro Angler
Pro Angler
Posts: 1948
Joined: Sat Aug 29, 2015 1:34 pm
Location: NW OKC OK USA

Re: Ultimate Cost No Object BFS reel for 1/32 or lighter lures?

Post by poisonokie » Thu Jan 31, 2019 4:28 pm

Maybe with a trout blank rated down to zero or 1/64, some Hedgehog Air ceramic bearings and the least amount of braided line possible, an Alphas ASC could do 1/32nd. Mine casts the hell out of 2.3g aerodynamic spoons on an UL bass rod with stock bearings (which seem to be very, very good out of the box) and ~40m 6# Invizx, but I tried one of those rebel micro craws with the single barbless hook and failed miserably.
This is the way.

ss30378
Platinum Angler
Platinum Angler
Posts: 1081
Joined: Fri Apr 27, 2012 2:42 pm
Location: Huntsville, AL

Re: Ultimate Cost No Object BFS reel for 1/32 or lighter lures?

Post by ss30378 » Thu Jan 31, 2019 4:45 pm

The rod will have to be built off a trout or fly blank to load at all with 1g lures regardless so assuming you have that.

Stock reel: air stream custom or 16 aldebaran bfs or abu bf8

Modified reel: 16 aldebaran bfs with avail trout spool (4.75g with bearing) along with the additional magnet kit that is needed to go with the spool.

User avatar
Hobie-Wan Kenobi
Pro Angler
Pro Angler
Posts: 3014
Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2014 1:25 pm
Location: Michigan (U.P)
Contact:

Re: Ultimate Cost No Object BFS reel for 1/32 or lighter lures?

Post by Hobie-Wan Kenobi » Thu Jan 31, 2019 5:29 pm

ss30378 wrote:The rod will have to be built off a trout or fly blank to load at all with 1g lures regardless so assuming you have that.


Modified reel: 16 aldebaran bfs with avail trout spool (4.75g with bearing) along with the additional magnet kit that is needed to go with the spool.
This
IG @hobie_wan_kenobi_fishing

ultralight
Platinum Angler
Platinum Angler
Posts: 1336
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2004 2:32 pm

Re: Ultimate Cost No Object BFS reel for 1/32 or lighter lures?

Post by ultralight » Thu Jan 31, 2019 11:03 pm

Thanks everyone! Helpful to know where the 'bleedin edge' is.

You mean that avail trout spool weighs only 4.75 grams WITH the bearings? What is that spool without bearings then? (Doing a search online, I thought sellers are listing that at 7.5 grams so I must not be looking at the right spool. That spool has more holes than material....:)

And what would be the stock BF8 spool be WITH bearings.

if I am understanding it correctly, then 4.75 grams is just crazy!! Some of your UL lures weigh a lot more than that! Wow.

User avatar
Hobie-Wan Kenobi
Pro Angler
Pro Angler
Posts: 3014
Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2014 1:25 pm
Location: Michigan (U.P)
Contact:

Re: Ultimate Cost No Object BFS reel for 1/32 or lighter lures?

Post by Hobie-Wan Kenobi » Fri Feb 01, 2019 5:12 am

ultralight wrote:Thanks everyone! Helpful to know where the 'bleedin edge' is.

You mean that avail trout spool weighs only 4.75 grams WITH the bearings? What is that spool without bearings then? (Doing a search online, I thought sellers are listing that at 7.5 grams so I must not be looking at the right spool. That spool has more holes than material....:)

And what would be the stock BF8 spool be WITH bearings.

if I am understanding it correctly, then 4.75 grams is just crazy!! Some of your UL lures weigh a lot more than that! Wow.
The Avail spool is the 16ALD15 spool. It has no holes
IG @hobie_wan_kenobi_fishing

Edward78
Elite Angler
Elite Angler
Posts: 215
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2019 4:28 am
Location: Newburg, Md
Contact:

Re: Ultimate Cost No Object BFS reel for 1/32 or lighter lures?

Post by Edward78 » Fri Feb 01, 2019 5:54 am

I have the Avail spool on the way and just got the Kuying Teton TTC-522SUL rod and its a noodle and loads with the rod weight alone. So we will see how it all comes together

Edward

ss30378
Platinum Angler
Platinum Angler
Posts: 1081
Joined: Fri Apr 27, 2012 2:42 pm
Location: Huntsville, AL

Re: Ultimate Cost No Object BFS reel for 1/32 or lighter lures?

Post by ss30378 » Fri Feb 01, 2019 4:53 pm

ultralight wrote:Thanks everyone! Helpful to know where the 'bleedin edge' is.

You mean that avail trout spool weighs only 4.75 grams WITH the bearings? What is that spool without bearings then? (Doing a search online, I thought sellers are listing that at 7.5 grams so I must not be looking at the right spool. That spool has more holes than material....:)

And what would be the stock BF8 spool be WITH bearings.

if I am understanding it correctly, then 4.75 grams is just crazy!! Some of your UL lures weigh a lot more than that! Wow.
Yes 4.75g with bearing on it. The stock bf8 spool weighs 7.5g with the factory bearing. The avail spool has no holes, as stated its the 16ALD15 spool.

ultralight
Platinum Angler
Platinum Angler
Posts: 1336
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2004 2:32 pm

Re: Ultimate Cost No Object BFS reel for 1/32 or lighter lures?

Post by ultralight » Fri Feb 01, 2019 11:57 pm

Thanks. That does sound amazing.

User avatar
Hobie-Wan Kenobi
Pro Angler
Pro Angler
Posts: 3014
Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2014 1:25 pm
Location: Michigan (U.P)
Contact:

Re: Ultimate Cost No Object BFS reel for 1/32 or lighter lures?

Post by Hobie-Wan Kenobi » Sat Feb 02, 2019 9:39 am

I was even thinking of drilling holes in it :big grin:
IG @hobie_wan_kenobi_fishing

ultralight
Platinum Angler
Platinum Angler
Posts: 1336
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2004 2:32 pm

Re: Ultimate Cost No Object BFS reel for 1/32 or lighter lures?

Post by ultralight » Sat Feb 02, 2019 9:42 am

I was wondering about that too.... gotta be a reason why they don't. perhaps the metal is far too thin? Or perhaps that would work if one is using 2lbs test and loading it to half the capacity....

Post Reply