Steez 103SHA vs. 100SHA

Reels are the hottest topic for TackleTour. Everyone wants to know what the latest and greatest is and how they compare to the old guard. What's the best for light stuff, or what's your suggestion for heavy cover. Do we really need different retrieve ratios? It's all in here.
Post Reply
Bushwacker
Senior Angler
Senior Angler
Posts: 112
Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2007 12:50 pm
Location: Sauk Centre, MN

Steez 103SHA vs. 100SHA

Post by Bushwacker » Mon May 09, 2011 7:19 am

I have a Steez 103SHA and a Steez 103HA. I am going to get another Steez in the 7.1 gear ratio. My question is am I missing anything by sticking to the 103 and not trying out a 100? 95% of the duty of the reel will be pitching Beavers or other weighted plastics. Just looking for some input if I should try out the 100? I like the idea of the longer handle, but I am a huge fan of pitching with the 103's that I have already. Thanks!

User avatar
Buck2thPerch
Pro Angler
Pro Angler
Posts: 1751
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2011 12:46 pm
Location: Lake Demontraville, MN

Re: Steez 103SHA vs. 100SHA

Post by Buck2thPerch » Mon May 09, 2011 1:10 pm

your questions have already been asked before. Steez 103 vs 100. It was a recent topic. I don't have these reels so I cannot comment. But search the threads.
Marine General Staff - Duluth MN
**What is fishing?**

Pmedicbm
Elite Angler
Elite Angler
Posts: 291
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2007 9:23 am

Re: Steez 103SHA vs. 100SHA

Post by Pmedicbm » Tue May 10, 2011 3:41 am

I've owned both and done several side by side comparisons.. When it comes to lighter baits and pitching duties the 103 is a gem.. Where you'll see the difference is with heavier lures, where the 100 seems to hit it's sweet spot.. The only way I know to really describe it is, the 103 casts and pitches great, whereas the 100 seemed to lag some with the pitching, shorter presentations and the lighter baits... The 103 is the way to go for me, as I sold both of the 100's and replaced them with 103's.... Good luck.....
Pmedicbm

Bushwacker
Senior Angler
Senior Angler
Posts: 112
Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2007 12:50 pm
Location: Sauk Centre, MN

Re: Steez 103SHA vs. 100SHA

Post by Bushwacker » Tue May 10, 2011 10:32 am

Pmedicbm wrote:I've owned both and done several side by side comparisons.. When it comes to lighter baits and pitching duties the 103 is a gem.. Where you'll see the difference is with heavier lures, where the 100 seems to hit it's sweet spot.. The only way I know to really describe it is, the 103 casts and pitches great, whereas the 100 seemed to lag some with the pitching, shorter presentations and the lighter baits... The 103 is the way to go for me, as I sold both of the 100's and replaced them with 103's.... Good luck.....
Thanks for the info. I have never owned a 100 so I was thinking about trying one, but everything I read says stick with the 103 size. I think that is what I will do. Thanks!

steve1206
Pro Angler
Pro Angler
Posts: 2165
Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2011 12:33 pm
Location: St. Peters, MO

Re: Steez 103SHA vs. 100SHA

Post by steve1206 » Tue May 10, 2011 2:12 pm

Bushwacker wrote:
Pmedicbm wrote:I've owned both and done several side by side comparisons.. When it comes to lighter baits and pitching duties the 103 is a gem.. Where you'll see the difference is with heavier lures, where the 100 seems to hit it's sweet spot.. The only way I know to really describe it is, the 103 casts and pitches great, whereas the 100 seemed to lag some with the pitching, shorter presentations and the lighter baits... The 103 is the way to go for me, as I sold both of the 100's and replaced them with 103's.... Good luck.....
Thanks for the info. I have never owned a 100 so I was thinking about trying one, but everything I read says stick with the 103 size. I think that is what I will do. Thanks!
So funny...I just bought one of each and I like the 100SHA....I bought the 103 to pitch and the 100 to cast...Thing is, I'm pitching heavier baits and I like the 100 for both (of course, with a big brush hog you could pitch with an old levelwind w/o a free spool)...I have Core 50Mg7s for pitching lighter stuff and got the Steez's for their line capacity...Actually thinking about turning my 103 into a 100, for the apps I'm using them for right now.

brokeneye
Platinum Angler
Platinum Angler
Posts: 1290
Joined: Wed Feb 11, 2004 3:29 pm

Re: Steez 103SHA vs. 100SHA

Post by brokeneye » Tue May 10, 2011 2:25 pm

for your stated purposes...103.
don't cry because it's over...smile because it happened.

User avatar
ogrich31
Elite Angler
Elite Angler
Posts: 662
Joined: Wed Apr 26, 2006 11:21 pm
Location: Southern California

Re: Steez 103SHA vs. 100SHA

Post by ogrich31 » Tue May 10, 2011 3:53 pm

Just curious because I'll be picking up one in the near future but would the 103SHA pitch 3/8-1/2 oz jigs better than the 100SHA or at that weight it wouldn't really make a difference.

capt1fish
Elite Angler
Elite Angler
Posts: 497
Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2004 2:54 pm
Location: Cal Delta

Re: Steez 103SHA vs. 100SHA

Post by capt1fish » Tue May 10, 2011 5:43 pm

ogrich31 wrote:Just curious because I'll be picking up one in the near future but would the 103SHA pitch 3/8-1/2 oz jigs better than the 100SHA or at that weight it wouldn't really make a difference.
Won't make that much of a difference, if any.

User avatar
bronzefly
Pro Angler
Pro Angler
Posts: 5036
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 5:21 pm
Location: www.tackletrap.com
Contact:

Re: Steez 103SHA vs. 100SHA

Post by bronzefly » Wed May 11, 2011 7:04 am

ogrich31 wrote:Just curious because I'll be picking up one in the near future but would the 103SHA pitch 3/8-1/2 oz jigs better than the 100SHA or at that weight it wouldn't really make a difference.
3/8 is the cutoff for me. 3/8 and less, I like the 103 better for pitching. Anything heavier, pitching or casting, I prefer the 100 size reel.
www.tackletrap.com
facebook.com/tackletrap

spencerinstl
Pro Angler
Pro Angler
Posts: 1581
Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2011 1:43 am
Location: IL

Re: Steez 103SHA vs. 100SHA

Post by spencerinstl » Wed May 11, 2011 9:39 am

bronzefly wrote: 3/8 is the cutoff for me. 3/8 and less, I like the 103 better for pitching. Anything heavier, pitching or casting, I prefer the 100 size reel.
What is the low end under 3/8 oz for you with the 103? And what reel do you like to use for stuff too light for the 103?
Thanks for the epiphany captain obvious

User avatar
bronzefly
Pro Angler
Pro Angler
Posts: 5036
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 5:21 pm
Location: www.tackletrap.com
Contact:

Re: Steez 103SHA vs. 100SHA

Post by bronzefly » Wed May 11, 2011 10:52 am

spencerinstl wrote:
What is the low end under 3/8 oz for you with the 103? And what reel do you like to use for stuff too light for the 103?
Paired with the right line and right rod, the 103 pitches 1/8 oz texas rigged finesse plastic (NO, not a 5" senko! :lol: ) very nicely. Of cousre, e_bassfisher has worked his magic my steezes and that definitely makes a difference. I like pitching 1/4 oz jigs with it as well. Anything lighter than that, I go Pixzilla or Conquest 50 most often. I do pitch heavier baits with the 103, but performance wise, at about 1/2 oz, I don't think there is a significant difference between it and the 100 steez.
www.tackletrap.com
facebook.com/tackletrap

Post Reply