G. Loomis MBR 842 GLX
G. Loomis MBR 842 GLX
For those of you who have one, is the Loomis MBR 842 GLX mag bass rod a good rod for small crankbaits? Also, what other applications is it good for? Finally, is it a significantly different rod than its cousin, the MBR 782 GLX?
Thanks
Thanks
-
- Senior Angler
- Posts: 127
- Joined: Sun May 28, 2017 6:11 am
Re: G. Loomis MBR 842 GLX
I have the MBR 842 GLX and use it for jerk baits as well as a drop shot rod. I think it would make an excellent small crank rod.
I don't have a 782 to compare.
I don't have a 782 to compare.
Re: G. Loomis MBR 842 GLX
Hi Blacktail 8541.
If you're using it for jerkbaits, I assume you snap the rod sideways to impart action to the jerkbait. Correct? Is that method difficult to learn? I've always snapped the rod downwards, using shorter rods. I'm 5'8"; so, I'm a bit height challenged to begin with; and, snapping downward with the longer rod might pose a challenge.
If you're using it for jerkbaits, I assume you snap the rod sideways to impart action to the jerkbait. Correct? Is that method difficult to learn? I've always snapped the rod downwards, using shorter rods. I'm 5'8"; so, I'm a bit height challenged to begin with; and, snapping downward with the longer rod might pose a challenge.
-
- Senior Angler
- Posts: 127
- Joined: Sun May 28, 2017 6:11 am
Re: G. Loomis MBR 842 GLX
I'm 6ft and use a straight down action.
-
- Pro Angler
- Posts: 1919
- Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 10:51 pm
Re: G. Loomis MBR 842 GLX
Anything “mag” finesse. I also like it for smaller topwaters like a 1/4 or 3/8 oz popper style bait.
Re: G. Loomis MBR 842 GLX
I own multiples of both the classic GLX MBR 842 and 782 and they are significantly different in my hand. 842 is faster in action and about a 1/2 power greater than the 782. Both excellent rods, and two I will never part with.Greg64 wrote:Finally, is it a significantly different rod than its cousin, the MBR 782 GLX?
Thanks
Re: G. Loomis MBR 842 GLX
JDLaman wrote:I own multiples of both the classic GLX MBR 842 and 782 and they are significantly different in my hand. 842 is faster in action and about a 1/2 power greater than the 782. Both excellent rods, and two I will never part with.Greg64 wrote:Finally, is it a significantly different rod than its cousin, the MBR 782 GLX?
Thanks
Which do you prefer for pointers, 110's, and the like. Been thinking about picking up a classic GLX 842, or possibly the IMX JBR
Re: G. Loomis MBR 842 GLX
The 842 for pointers, and the 782 I use for topwaters.
Re: G. Loomis MBR 842 GLX
That is very interesting to hear. I have an classic 782 GLX and found it slower and less powerful then I expected based on experience with a few different mbr783 and cr 723 rods. I never though that the classic 842 would be stronger and faster. I like the 782 for wacky worms and other open hook stuff but it's not the ideal light t-rig rod I was looking for.JDLaman wrote: I own multiples of both the classic GLX MBR 842 and 782 and they are significantly different in my hand. 842 is faster in action and about a 1/2 power greater than the 782. Both excellent rods, and two I will never part with.
Re: G. Loomis MBR 842 GLX
Thanks, I'll be on the lookout for a classic 842 mbr then .JDLaman wrote:The 842 for pointers, and the 782 I use for topwaters.
Re: G. Loomis MBR 842 GLX
mine are older models
782 for pointer 78 size, Pop'rs, Sammy 85 and any kind of small crank. can't stand the rod for bottom bouncing. Exceed 1/2 oz and rod is overloaded
842 for finesse bottom bouncing, found I did not like if for anything else. the strangest thing was preferring lipless cranks on the 843 over the 842.
782 for pointer 78 size, Pop'rs, Sammy 85 and any kind of small crank. can't stand the rod for bottom bouncing. Exceed 1/2 oz and rod is overloaded
842 for finesse bottom bouncing, found I did not like if for anything else. the strangest thing was preferring lipless cranks on the 843 over the 842.
Re: G. Loomis MBR 842 GLX
I'm the opposite. I caught several fish throwing lipless cranks on my GLX 842. I guess I feel more comfortable about not pulling the hook when I apply more pressure on the fish with it. I have the GLX 843 too.i guess it also depends on what type of cover your fishing too. I just bought a tatula elite 6'8ml for my jerkbait rod. I mostly throw vision 110's. I do love my GLX 842 and 843. I kayak fish too. The 3 rods that always go with me are those 2 and my Nrx 893. After that it's a toss up for my 4th rod. Kistler Helium 7'3H xf or GLX 822dsr(love this rod).
I'll be fishing on cape cod this upcoming saturday(open water still, hopefully), I plan on throwing some 1/4 oz blade baits on my GLX 842. See how it does. Can't go wrong it. Great rod. Got off track. Sorry
I'll be fishing on cape cod this upcoming saturday(open water still, hopefully), I plan on throwing some 1/4 oz blade baits on my GLX 842. See how it does. Can't go wrong it. Great rod. Got off track. Sorry
Re: G. Loomis MBR 842 GLX
I have the MBR842 GLX as well. Mainly use it for spinnerbaits and bottom contact but I used it with squarebills, shallow cranks as well. Very versatile rod, had mine for at least 10 years, would never part with it.
Re: G. Loomis MBR 842 GLX
FYI,
I have the newer GLX 842 model. If that matters.
I have the newer GLX 842 model. If that matters.
Re: G. Loomis MBR 842 GLX
I have owned two OG MBR 842's and one new version. I prefer the newer version and it's not even close. It's much more sensitive and faster actioned and the longer handle makes it much more balanced. I love it for jerkbaits, but found it a little long for my style but the action will handle them with ease. Mine is used for drop shotting with a casting reel, dragging tubes, 4" senkos, and topwaters...but mainly the finesse stuff. Great rod!!