Re: Shimano Loomis Conquest rods
Posted: Wed Mar 21, 2018 9:58 am
Hey I have the same combo except mine says NRX....strange
Still waiting on a couple. 903C 904C 842C 843C and 842SBigG wrote:Looks like you need 2 more. Conquest/Conquest = Awesome.cndbasshunter wrote:2nd combo
I feel you. I quit trying jdm rods after the steez compile x wasn't as impressive as my glx/bcr's back in '08. Granted I'm a rod junkie and will probably end up with a conquest or two....I just think they got this callaboration backwards. If you had a collaboration between Gucci and Dickies....who wouldd you choose to do the styling and which would build the material?Tigerbass wrote:I wish Loomis would add a little "bling" to their rods. I hate the look of the little cork fore grip. I've always loved their blanks, just not their look.........of course it hasn't exactly stopped me from buying their rods, but I might have a few more if they looked better!
And they messed up and let me buy my first Megabass rod, partially because of this. Now Megabass has caught up to Loomis in my arsenal!!!
KP Duty wrote:I feel you. I quit trying jdm rods after the steez compile x wasn't as impressive as my glx/bcr's back in '08. Granted I'm a rod junkie and will probably end up with a conquest or two....I just think they got this callaboration backwards. If you had a collaboration between Gucci and Dickies....who wouldd you choose to do the styling and which would build the material?Tigerbass wrote:I wish Loomis would add a little "bling" to their rods. I hate the look of the little cork fore grip. I've always loved their blanks, just not their look.........of course it hasn't exactly stopped me from buying their rods, but I might have a few more if they looked better!
And they messed up and let me buy my first Megabass rod, partially because of this. Now Megabass has caught up to Loomis in my arsenal!!!
That's all I have, lol. It's good that Japan has gary's resin so they can start building quality, fast blanks (I know....I'm bitter) In the 2000's it wasn't comparableTigerbass wrote:KP Duty wrote:I feel you. I quit trying jdm rods after the steez compile x wasn't as impressive as my glx/bcr's back in '08. Granted I'm a rod junkie and will probably end up with a conquest or two....I just think they got this callaboration backwards. If you had a collaboration between Gucci and Dickies....who wouldd you choose to do the styling and which would build the material?Tigerbass wrote:I wish Loomis would add a little "bling" to their rods. I hate the look of the little cork fore grip. I've always loved their blanks, just not their look.........of course it hasn't exactly stopped me from buying their rods, but I might have a few more if they looked better!
And they messed up and let me buy my first Megabass rod, partially because of this. Now Megabass has caught up to Loomis in my arsenal!!!
Gucci and Dickies...
Commonly that sounds like a heavier rod than you would use for that bait, however....the bfl here in Oklahoma was won in November by a dude throwing a spook on a 7'8" xh rod and a trick worn on a mh (1/4-1oz) rod with 20lb floro.Steve petty wrote:Fished today with mine. 904c with a Metanium MGL and 15# Tatsu. Caught 16 Spots tonight,biggest around 3. 3/16 shakeyhead with trick worm. Little overkill,got it for t-rig and jigs,but couldn’t resist fishing with it today. Wicked sensitive,can’t wait to go to Chickamauga this weekend!
I like the color of the wraps on the blue NRX better. My Conquest blue color looks kinda teal or like a yellow tone was added to the blue wraps. The Spiral X looks sweet and makes the rod more snappy than the NRX.Samuel_b wrote:Does anyone else prefer the look of the NRX to these? I like the split grip and the non x wrapped look far more. While I’m excited for the tapers, I don’t prefer the look. And I would rather my blank be handmade in Woodland as opposed to factory built in Asia...