Steez 103H or 100H...??

This is the place to talk shop about all the enthusiast and import tackle for the truly afflicted
User avatar
frogpond11
Pro Angler
Pro Angler
Posts: 2358
Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2005 8:36 am
Location: Baton Rouge, Louisiana

Steez 103H or 100H...??

Post by frogpond11 » Fri Sep 21, 2007 8:07 am

I've been doing a lot of reading about these 2 reels and I still can't seem to decide between the two. I may be buying one within the next few weeks and with a $400+ investment, I want to make the right decision. I know the 100H is designed for larger baits and longer casts...while the 103H is designed for smaller baits and more pitching apps. However, for the applications I want this reel for, I want it do a little bit of everything well.

The reel will go on 1 of 2 rods...when it is on my bcr853 GLX, I will use it for pitching/casting 3/16-5/16 oz t-rigs or jigs. It will be on that rod probably 50-60% of the time for those apps. But the other 40-50% of the time, it will be on my 6'9" MH Kistler Helium for all purpose duty...including lipless cranks ranging from 1/4-1/2 oz, regular cranks ranging from 1/4-3/8 oz, spinnerbaits from 1/4-3/8 oz, and other random things like 1/4-3/8 oz buzzbaits, etc. Would the 100H be able to handle casting 1/4 oz cranks/spinners/buzzers?? I know the 103H would be better with the 1/4 oz stuff..but I really like the idea of having the 90mm handle that comes on the 100H.

Any help in this decision would be greatly appreciated..thanks in advance!



Justin

dragon1
Pro Angler
Pro Angler
Posts: 10564
Joined: Fri Sep 22, 2006 8:23 am
Location: Murfreesboro TN

Re: Steez 103H or 100H...??

Post by dragon1 » Fri Sep 21, 2007 8:31 am

My guess is that the 100H will handle the 1/4 as well but still provide for more line capacity and ultimately longer casts with bigger baits.

Also consider that you can always get the 103 spool, but with the 100H, at least you already have the larger handle.

BTW...I will be VERY interested in your comments about this reel and hope that it will be good enough to stay in your arsenal being a Daiwa. 8-)

User avatar
frogpond11
Pro Angler
Pro Angler
Posts: 2358
Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2005 8:36 am
Location: Baton Rouge, Louisiana

Re: Steez 103H or 100H...??

Post by frogpond11 » Fri Sep 21, 2007 8:52 am

I've got nothing against Daiwa... I had a few bad experiences with them but I own a Fuego that has the 4-bearing TD-Z handle and I really like it a lot. Plus I hear everyone praising the Steez all the time, so I figured I'd give it a shot.

2 questions to add to the ones listed above -> 1) Does the 103H have a different braking system than the 100H? Magforce V vs Magforce Z..?? 2) How much is the 103H spool by itself?



Justin

User avatar
ChuckE
TT Gear Crew
TT Gear Crew
Posts: 2880
Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2005 5:31 am
Location: Illinois

Re: Steez 103H or 100H...??

Post by ChuckE » Fri Sep 21, 2007 9:43 am

The 100H spool has Magforce Z, while the 103 spool has Magforce V. The braking system and line capacity (depth and sides), is the major difference between the spools. Magforce V requires a tapered sided spool for the tabs to ride on, while Magforce Z has a seperate tapered edge the braking tabs ride on.

A 103 spool ran ~$100 the last time I checked. Daiwa USA has them in stock most of the time now.

I'd be inclined to go with the 103. I haven't had any problem casting some of the heavier stuff and it is a pitching machine! Swapping a reel between rods is cumbersome, and I've found I prefer different line on my reels that I use for distance casting, heavier baits, etc. anyway. Chances are you'll eventually get both anyway, so save the $100 toward a 100 Steez........ Maybe even use the Fuego for the heavy stuff? ;)

Chuck
TackleTour
Contributing Editor, Gear Crew Member and Moderator

backcast
Elite Angler
Elite Angler
Posts: 285
Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2006 4:22 pm

Re: Steez 103H or 100H...??

Post by backcast » Fri Sep 21, 2007 10:51 am

The 103 casts at least as far as I can reasonably expect to accomplish a hook set. For all around casting it equals or beats anything else I have. Yeah the Pixy and Conquest 50 may do better on really light stuff, and the 100DC may be better for heavy stuff, but the differences are slight, and for general use the Steez is as good or better than all the other reels I have. Have no first hand knowledge of the 100.

I have use a 103 on a 6'9" Helium and it is a great combination.

ChuckE, in your earlier review of the Steez, you mentioned the possibility of using a Steez (103 at that time) spool in a TD-Z. What are you thoughts about this now? Thanks

User avatar
ChuckE
TT Gear Crew
TT Gear Crew
Posts: 2880
Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2005 5:31 am
Location: Illinois

Re: Steez 103H or 100H...??

Post by ChuckE » Fri Sep 21, 2007 12:11 pm

bcast,
The Steez spool works in the TD-Z, with similar but not exactly the same results. (I suspect this has more to do with the travel of the inductor and magnets in the TD-Z. The magnets are a little different in the Steez.) Although the spool is a little lighter and has more bling, I've purchased more TD-Z 103 spools, than I have Steez spools lately. Considering the spool's price (about twice as much as a TD-Z103 spool), I'm not sure it is worth it in a TD-Z. In addition, I've pretty much elected to just go with new Steez's. ;)

Chuck
TackleTour
Contributing Editor, Gear Crew Member and Moderator

Want
Platinum Angler
Platinum Angler
Posts: 1129
Joined: Mon Sep 25, 2006 5:55 pm
Location: Toronto, Ontario

Re: Steez 103H or 100H...??

Post by Want » Fri Sep 21, 2007 12:36 pm

Backcast wrote:
Yeah the Pixy and Conquest 50 may do better on really light stuff, and the 100DC may be better for heavy stuff, but the differences are slight, and for general use the Steez is as good or better than all the other reels I have
I find this discussion kind of timely. Hope I'm not highjacking the thread. I'm deciding which way to go in terms of my next reel (MG7, Conquest 101DC, Steez) but keep going back to the idea of "rounding out" my set of Daiwas. I own a D.R. tuned Pixy and a D.R. tuned Fuego. From what I gather from you and Chuck is that the Steez 103 would be a pretty good addition for 1/4-1/2 oz applications? Is that the best weight range for this reel?

User avatar
ChuckE
TT Gear Crew
TT Gear Crew
Posts: 2880
Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2005 5:31 am
Location: Illinois

Re: Steez 103H or 100H...??

Post by ChuckE » Fri Sep 21, 2007 12:54 pm

wantthat asked:
...is that the Steez 103 would be a pretty good addition for 1/4-1/2 oz applications?
It works great in that range. You can go a little lower if you select the right rod, but that's what you have the Pixy for. Going higher isn't a problem either.

Chuck
TackleTour
Contributing Editor, Gear Crew Member and Moderator

Want
Platinum Angler
Platinum Angler
Posts: 1129
Joined: Mon Sep 25, 2006 5:55 pm
Location: Toronto, Ontario

Re: Steez 103H or 100H...??

Post by Want » Fri Sep 21, 2007 1:03 pm

Thanks Chuck. I think it's a done deal for me. Steez 103 it is.

backcast
Elite Angler
Elite Angler
Posts: 285
Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2006 4:22 pm

Re: Steez 103H or 100H...??

Post by backcast » Fri Sep 21, 2007 4:05 pm

ChuckE - thanks for the update and your advice on the spools.

wantthat2 - I have 2 Steez and only one 100DC. There is a reason for that. Like both, but the Steez a little more. Sold a Calais DC to buy the second Steez. Was not a matter of the Calais DC being at least an equal performing reel to the Steez, but I really like the weight and ergonomics of the Steez that much more. I could see reasons to opt for the Calais DC over the Steez such as heavier fishing (built like a tank) or possibly salt, but for general bass weight fishing the Steez tops my list (at least for now).

User avatar
phatbass
Pro Angler
Pro Angler
Posts: 1716
Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2005 7:13 pm
Location: Orland park,IL

Re: Steez 103H or 100H...??

Post by phatbass » Fri Sep 21, 2007 4:18 pm

I use 2 steez 103h reels and they pitch and cast great,1 is on a helium 6'9'apc and the other on a mbr 844 imx.I like the steez 103 h so much ,that Isold a nib typeR+ to buy my second one.

Want
Platinum Angler
Platinum Angler
Posts: 1129
Joined: Mon Sep 25, 2006 5:55 pm
Location: Toronto, Ontario

Re: Steez 103H or 100H...??

Post by Want » Fri Sep 21, 2007 4:39 pm

Thanks for the feedback guys. I own a Conquest 201 DC but I wasn't sure how much more the 101DC would add to my Shimano sets. (I've only been thinking about this for 4 or so months :lol:)

I think the Steez 103 is definitely the right move. Thanks again. Vic

dragon1
Pro Angler
Pro Angler
Posts: 10564
Joined: Fri Sep 22, 2006 8:23 am
Location: Murfreesboro TN

Re: Steez 103H or 100H...??

Post by dragon1 » Fri Sep 21, 2007 11:37 pm

frogpond...I find generally, if fishermen choose Daiwa or Shimano and not both it is usually due to past experience/loyalty/bias/etc OR they prefer the feel/design of one over the other.

These two companies IMO are the best at making bass reels but have diff philosophies for engineering/design and fishability. I like both of them for diff purposes.

User avatar
Dave079
Senior Angler
Senior Angler
Posts: 145
Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2007 11:54 am
Location: New Orleans, Louisiana

Re: Steez 103H or 100H...??

Post by Dave079 » Sat Sep 22, 2007 1:55 pm

I just got my 103HA in a few hours ago. I have played around in my pond a little while this afternoon with it and all I can say is wow. I have never experienced such a nice reel. With just an underhand flick of the wrist I am amazed how far and accurate I can throw a Senko.

LATERAL LINE
Newbie Angler
Newbie Angler
Posts: 5
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2007 9:35 am
Location: OOLTEWAH, TENNESSEE
Contact:

Re: Steez 103H or 100H...??

Post by LATERAL LINE » Wed Sep 26, 2007 10:00 am

[font=Courier][/font] I just got a Daiwa Steez 100h Deep spool reel with a DAIWA STEEZ STZ671MHFBA rod.........where do I get instructions for the reel in English.......

Thanks......LATER LINE
Attachments
ferrari13.jpg
ferrari13.jpg (88.57 KiB) Viewed 6969 times

Post Reply